Legal Opinion
Moore v. Yehl
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 2, 2022No. 6:21-cv-06760Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT MOORE, III, Petitioner, Case # 21-CV-6760-FPG v. ORDER SUPERINTENDENT C. YEHL, Respondent. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, pro se Petitioner Robert Moore, III, brings this habeas petition to challenge his state-court convictions. ECF No. 1. Acknowledging that he has filed a so-called “mixed” petition—consisting of both exhausted claims and an unexhausted claim— Petitioner requests a stay of these proceedings so that he can fully litigate the pending unexhausted claim in state court. ECF No. 1 at 7; ECF No. 2 at 1-4.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wesley-Rosa v. KaplanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Carr v. GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.