Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Givis
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 28, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankenthaler, S.
Upon the settlement of the decree in this discovery proceeding question has arisen as to the right of the respondent savings bank to require a provision in the decree that payment by the bank in compliance with the prior determination of the court (Matter of Givis, N. Y. L. J., Dec. 10, 1951, p. 1571, col. 6) be conditioned upon either a presentation of the passbook or the furnishing by petitioner of an indemnity bond in double the amount of the payment. The respondent bank refers to the requirements of its contract with its deposi*1115tor, a corespondent herein. The authority for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. FancherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Hatch v. Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Myers v. Albany Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Myers v. Albany Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Walsh v. National Broadway BankNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of TosettiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- Dumpson v. Empire City Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1964