Reber v. Brownback
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 6, Oct. T., 1904, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., April T., 1903, No. 46, on verdict for plaintiff in ease of Mary A. Reber, trading as Reading Electrical Supply and Construction Co. v. Harry I. Brownback and Enos L. Buckwalter. Assumpsit for work done and material furnished and delivered. Before Butler, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,363.29. Defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The plaintiff made a written offer, which was accepted by defendants, to wire for electric lighting the defendants’ theater. The paper contained this clause: “ The above work we agree to do by the day and material, and the approximate cost of the same will not be more than $337. We further agree to itemize all material used and labor and will try to make the work cost as little as possible, giving the above parties the benefit, should it be lower in cost.” The amount of wiring and the details of the work contemplated were not fully set forth in the paper but were shown…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holloway v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Malone v. Phila. & Reading R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Green v. PaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anstead v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Producers Coke Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Thompson v. StoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.