Legal Opinion
Special Assembly Interim Committee on Public Morals v. Southard
California Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1939No. L. A. 16753PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
13 Cal.2d 497 (1939)
THE SPECIAL ASSEMBLY INTERIM COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC MORALS OF THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE, Appellant,
v.
HARRY A. SOUTHARD et al., Respondents.
L. A. No. 16753.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
May 6, 1939.
Fred B. Wood, George W. Wakefield, Arthur McHenry and Norris J. Burke for Appellant.
Melvyn I. Cronin, as Amicus Curiae, on Behalf of Appellant.
George W. Rochester for Respondents.
THE COURT.
A rehearing was granted in this matter in order that a reexamination of the law applicable thereto might be made in the light of further arguments advanced in the petition for rehearing.…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re BattelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016