Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Trattner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 16, 1960Published

1Opinion of the Court

Maximilian Moss, S.

Upon all the proof, the court sustains the objections of the Commissioner of Hospitals, whose claim is allowed in full without interest. There was no obligation upon the part of the hospital to seek payment from the Associated Hospital Service, nor is there any proof that the testator was entitled to benefits from the said Associated Hospital Service.

The proof adduced establishes that the decedent’s father, brother and both sisters, and the brother’s and sisters’ respective issue, as named in the petition, with the exception of Moses Kuflik, a son of testator’s sister…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. In re the Accounting of BurgmyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  3. In re the Estate of LoglierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API