Erdman v. National Indemnity Company
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■ Smith, J.
We dismiss this appeal for lack of an appealable order. In disclaiming jurisdiction over defendant, the district court did no more than sustain a special appearance and overrule a purported motion for a new trial.
The basis of the disclaimer was an objection by defendant, a Nebraska corporation with its home office in Omaha, that summons had been served on a person outside the class authorized by section 25-511, R. R. S. 1943.
An order sustaining an objection to personal jurisdiction is not final within the meaning of section 25-1902, R. R. S. 1943. See, Standard Distilling Co. v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Persinger v. TinkleNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Standard Distilling Co. v. FreyhanNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Erdman v. National Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Busboom v. GregoryNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. DressmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
- Ruse v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.