Legal Opinion

Erdman v. National Indemnity Company

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1965No. 35812PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ Smith, J.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of an appealable order. In disclaiming jurisdiction over defendant, the district court did no more than sustain a special appearance and overrule a purported motion for a new trial.

The basis of the disclaimer was an objection by defendant, a Nebraska corporation with its home office in Omaha, that summons had been served on a person outside the class authorized by section 25-511, R. R. S. 1943.

An order sustaining an objection to personal jurisdiction is not final within the meaning of section 25-1902, R. R. S. 1943. See, Standard Distilling Co. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Persinger v. TinkleNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Standard Distilling Co. v. FreyhanNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Erdman v. National Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Busboom v. GregoryNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. DressmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ruse v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API