United States v. Castillo-Bustamante
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Armando Castillo-Bustamante (Castillo) pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having been deported and after having been convicted of an “aggravated felony,” a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court sen*735tenced him to an 18-month prison term and to two years of supervised release.
For the first time on appeal, Castillo argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated-felony conviction…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- De La Cruz-Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Cruz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Cruz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Castillo-BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005