Legal Opinion

United States v. Castillo-Bustamante

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 2004No. 04-40623PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Armando Castillo-Bustamante (Castillo) pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having been deported and after having been convicted of an “aggravated felony,” a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court sen*735tenced him to an 18-month prison term and to two years of supervised release.

For the first time on appeal, Castillo argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated-felony conviction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. De La Cruz-Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Cruz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Cruz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. United States v. Castillo-BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API