Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cammisa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 24, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for a cosmetics company for approximately 20 years. In an effort to downsize its workforce, the employer gave employees an incentive to voluntarily leave their jobs by offering a severance package. Claimant accepted the package and left her employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that she was disqualified from receiving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Claim HotalingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of BealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re KeaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. In re the Claim of LuchtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of StandfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re the Claim of WillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. In re the Claim of WillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API