Legal Opinion · Dissent

Derle Farms, Inc. v. Barber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1981Published

1DissentCasey, J.

Casey, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. In my view the majority misconstrues the subpoena provisions of the Agriculture and Markets Law. Sections 22, 34 and 254 of that law are the only statutes relative to the issuance of subpoenas. Sections 22 and 254 authorize the commissioner to subpoena witnesses and documents for investigations and inquiries that he is conducting, and, therefore, are inapplicable here. Section 34, which relates specifically to hearings, provides in subdivision 2, that “subpoenas shall be signed and issued by the commissioner”, and in subdivision 4, that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Bell v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Wellington Importers Ltd. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Gates v. DysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API