Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harrison v. Gillespie

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 2011No. 08-16602Published

1Dissent

THOMAS, Circuit Judge,

with whom REINHARDT, .FLETCHER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:

By all indications, the jurors in James Harrison’s capital trial had decided to acquit him of the death penalty. They had informed the trial judge that they were deadlocked between life with parole and life without parole. The trial judge acknowledged that the jury “was not discussing the death penalty.” However, rather than conduct the jury poll requested by defense counsel to ascertain whether the jury had reached, or could reach, a verdict on the death penalty, the trial judge…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API