Legal Opinion

Watson v. Miears

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided September 5, 1984No. HS 83-6076PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

OREN HARRIS, Senior District Judge.

In this diversity action the plaintiffs, Aaron L. Watson and Rubena Watson, d/b/a WATSON’S ANTIQUE SHOP, allege in their complaint filed August 9,1983, against the defendant, H.A. Miears, a breach of contract entered into in writing on April 13, 1983.

After several days of negotiation, the contract entered into by the parties provides that defendant Miears agrees to the purchase of the entire contents of Watson’s Antique Shop located in Hot Springs, Arkansas, with certain exceptions, for a price of $250,000.00. Further, the contract provides…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Wooten v. McClendonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. The Unlaub Company, Inc. v. Sam Sexton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Toney v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. SextonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aaron L. Watson and Rubena Watson, D/B/A Watson's Antique Shop v. H.A. MiearsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Surfaces, Inc. v. Point Blank Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API