Brookhart v. State

The appellant’s sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction by the trial court, sitting without a jury, on a charge of carrying two revolvers, concealed upon and about his person. It is claimed the evidence did not show that the weapons were concealed, or that they were on or about his. person, or that he had possession or control of them. However, we think there was ample evidence from which the trial court could find otherwise, as it did.

*626The State’s evidence was as follows. At about 3:00 A.M. two cruising police officers saw an old Buick come out of an…