Legal Opinion

David C. Hutchinson v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 14, 2001No. 15912-98, 15958-98, 15959-98, 15960-98Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

116 T.C. No. 14

UNITED STATES TAX COURT DAVID C. HUTCHINSON, ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 15912-98, 15958-98, Filed March 14, 2001. 15959-98, 15960-98. Held: Under the alternative cost method of Rev. Proc. 92-29, 1992- 1 C.B. 748, a real estate developer may allocate to its bases in lots sold $3,707,662 in estimated construction costs relating to common improvements. Held, further, $5,861,595 in estimated, future- period interest expense relating to common improvements does not qualify under the alternative cost method for allocation to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Weiss v. WeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  3. Shea v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  4. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API