Legal Opinion

Milner v. Outcalt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1950No. 31319PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Plaintiff Milner, a resident of Los Angeles, California, brought this suit on two promissory notes given by defendant Outcalt, a resident of Mexico City, Republic of Mexico. The first note was executed on March 2, 1942, in Mexico City, and was secured by the assignment of defendant Outcalt’s interest in two trusts, established by his grandfather and adoptive father, D. D. A. Outcalt, in Tacoma. The second note was executed on December 8, 1942, in Mexico City, and was secured by an assignment of Outcalt’s rights in an automobile, and some stock.

An aggregate of $7,067.87 is now due and owing on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bucknam v. BucknamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Medwedeff v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Knettle v. KnettleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. First National Bank v. OlufsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re PettitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  2. Erickson v. Bank of California, N.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Nelson v. White (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  4. In re the Estate of VoughtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  5. Erickson v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API