Crombie v. Rosentock
The Superior Court of New York City
I. July, 1887. Reference in foreclosure as to .distribution of surplus .moneys. The facts appear fully in the opinion of the referee.
1Opinion of the Court
Wilbur Larremore, Referee.
On March G, 1884, Alice Rosenstock, one of the defendants, was seized of certain premises in 119tli Street in the City of Rew York, having acquired the same the previous January by conveyance from her husband, Richard Rosenstock, through a third person, and for a nominal consideration. At this time a building was in course of erection upon said premises by said Richard Rosenstock, and various mechanic’s liens had been filed, and claims, not then in the form of liens, existed in favor of mechanics and material-men, for work performed and materials furnished in and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arnold v. PatrickNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Halsted v. . HalstedNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davison v. MacDonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Corporate Investing Co. v. Mount Vernon Metal Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Kittle v. Gordon, New York County Courts1933