Legal Opinion
Markovitz v. Markovitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 25, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*461Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura VisitacionLewis, J.), entered on or about April 22, 2005, which denied defendant’s motion for a stay of proceedings, discovery and equitable distribution of marital assets, and related relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant’s argument that the motion court impermissibly decided an issue that was not before it, namely, the validity of the parties’ separation/property settlement agreement, is improperly raised for the first time in her reply brief on appeal (see e.g. Matter of 370 Manhattan Ave. Co., L.L.C. v New York State Div. of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oberstein v. ObersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- 370 Manhattan Ave. Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Grubman v. GrubmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Luftig v. LuftigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Mahon v. MoormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hakim v. 65 Eighth Avenue, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Schnee v. SchneeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Schnee v. SchneeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013