Legal Opinion

Zaczek v. Zaczek

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMabio Pittont, J.

Motion for a change of venue is granted. Cross motion to dismiss the counterclaim is denied.

The complaint contains two causes of action: (1) for a judgment declaring the parties to be husband and wife, and (2) for a separation, and possession of certain real property owned by the parties as tenants by the entirety.

The fact that the plaintiff prays for possession of the premises, pursuant to section 1164-a of the Civil Practice Act, does not transform the second cause of action into any of the actions enumerated in section 183 of the Civil Practice Act, which would require a trial in Nassau…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taconic Inn Corp. v. HolsappleNew York Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gettinger v. Lattingtown Harbor Development Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Papp v. MoutsinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Burford v. BurfordNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Freifeld v. BeerNew York Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API