Legal Opinion

Burris v. Burgett

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 16, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

If the illegitimate children of the intestate’s daughter, who predeceased him, are entitled to the residue as distributees under the statutes of this State to any extent, they are entitled to all of it, and the collateral kin, the nephews and nieces, are entitled to none.

At common law a bastard was ‘ ‘ treated as nullius filius, and as such incapable of inheriting from either the putative father or the mother, and without heirs, excepting those of his own body." 7 C. J. 959. This rule was taken over as a part of the body of common law prevailing in this jurisdiction and is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foster v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  3. Forbes v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1900
  4. In re Mericlo, New York County Courts1882
  5. Holmes v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jung v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Magee v. ChambersCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
  3. Ernest DiSabatino & Sons, Inc. v. ApostolicoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. In re Adoption of A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. In Re Estate of KlingamanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API