Western Mining Co. v. Toole
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Eirst Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.
Plaintiff is a corporation, and had a mine at Tombstone, and operated a mill at Contention, about 10 miles distant from its mine. The business at the mine was transacted under the name of “The Western Mining Company,” and the business at the mill by the name of the “Contention Mill & Mining Company.” Defendants were bankers, who received the deposits of plaintiff, and paid out the same on plaintiff’s orders in the ordinary course of business. D. J. Bousfield was in charge of said mill, and transacted the business connected therewith. On the eighth day of August, A. D. 1881, a draft or order, *84p…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hicks v. HindeNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Mobley v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Paine v. LinhillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arnold v. National Bank of WaupacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905