Nahn v. Soffer
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
AHRENS, Judge.
In this bench-tried action, appellants Donald Soffer and Ten-Eighteen Investment Corporation (Ten-Eighteen) appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of respondents William and Shirley Nahn on respondents’ petition to quiet title and on appellants’ counterclaim for specific performance. We affirm.
Respondents own 1.26 undeveloped acres near Telegraph Road in St. Louis County. On June 28, 1986, Soffer and respondents entered into a one-year option contract for the sale of the property. The option provides in part:
This option may be accepted by either said second party or his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Kopp v. FranksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Scheble v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wooten v. DeMeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- McDermott v. BurpoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sunset Pools of St. Louis, Inc. v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Shellabarger v. ShellabargerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hostler v. Green Park Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Carolan v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Estate of Schler v. BensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.