Legal Opinion
Globe Construction Co. v. Oklahoma City Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1978No. Nos. 75-1464 to 75-1467, 75-1469 to 75-1472, 75-1475, 75-1479 and 75-1480PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
This controversy arises out of a construction contract that went awry. Globe Construction Company, a Colorado corporation, entered into a contract with the Oklahoma City Housing Authority, a public corporate body organized under the laws of Oklahoma, to perform certain rehabilitation work on the Will Rogers Low Rental Housing Project in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. General Insurance Company, as surety, executed a performance bond on behalf of Globe. Various subcontractors were employed by Globe.
The prime contract called for job completion within 180 days. The Authority…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Jaquith v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- All American Bus Lines v. SaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Barsh v. MullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Hambright v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Otoe County National Bank v. W & P Trucking, Inc., Charles E. Froelich, William J. Froelich, Jr., and Jack D. CramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Samuel G. Bialac, Debtor. Harsh Investment Corp. And Harsh Building Co. v. Samuel G. Bialac, in Re James T. Bialac, Debtor. Harsh Investment Corp. v. James T. BialacCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Bailey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Lockard v. LockardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.