Goodwin v. Sphatt
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Chief Judge.
John Goodwin seeks review of the order dismissing his four-count complaint against Marcus Sphatt and Buygone, Inc., based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. We reverse because the allegations in the complaint do not conclusively establish that the statute of limitations had run on any of Goodwin’s claims.
Goodwin’s complaint alleged that Goodwin, Sphatt, and Buygone, Inc., entered into a business venture that was memorialized in a shareholders’ agreement on November 7, 2005. The agreement was attached to the complaint. Sphatt managed the operation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. MacKalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Patten v. WindermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Brooke v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Technical Packaging, Inc. v. HanchettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Ambrose v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chakra 5 v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- HOME TITLE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC. v. MICHAEL J. LASALLADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Carolyn Banks v. Alachua County School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Kendron v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Weatherly v. Pershing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.