People ex rel. Sabichi v. Los Angeles Electric Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
This action is brought to have it determined that the defendant has forfeited and that it be excluded from all rights, privileges, right of way, and franchises acquired by it under a municipal ordinance passed by the city of Los Angeles on the twenty-eighth day of January, 1886. A copy of said ordinance is annexed to and made a part of the complaint.
In the complaint, two causes of action are separately stated. “The first,” in the language of respondent’s brief, “ is based upon the theory that the law does not permit any incorporated city or town in this state to grant authority to any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Mickles v. Rochester City BankNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Bear-Camp-River-Co. v. WoodmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1824
- Ormsby v. Vermont Copper Mining Co.New York Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Preston Mill Co. v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Town of Arcata v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Los Angeles Ry. Co. v. Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Farmers State Bank of Richardton v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.