Legal Opinion

The Hibernian Society v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 16, 1984No. 0219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

The respondent-appellant Hibernian Society (the Society) seeks a refund of 1979 and 1980 ad valorem taxes paid under protest to the appellant-respondent City of Charleston and the appellent County of Charleston. The question presented for our decision is whether certain real property owned by the Society qualifies under Section 12-37-220B(12) South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976, for exemption from taxation. The circuit court ruled the property is exempt, but failed to order that interest be paid on the refund from the City as provided by Section 12-47-230 of the South Carolina Code…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Harris County v. DowlearnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. City of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Bodiford v. Spanish Oaks Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Richland County Recreation District v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Darlington CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API