Legal Opinion

Farris v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 29, 1988No. 86-1137PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

Tommy Farris appeals, challenging a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Jim Walter Homes, Inc. (hereinafter “Jim Walter”), and Mary E. Simmons, in a suit claiming damages for wrongful foreclosure and seeking to exercise the statutory right of redemption.

On appeal, Farris argues that the foreclosure was improper. He says that Jim Walter wrongfully refused his attempt to cure; that he was never given notice of the foreclosure sale; that the sale was not conducted by the attorney of record; and that the resale to Mrs. Simmons was for a profit of $9,596.29, evidencing an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Auto-Plaza, Inc. v. Central Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Thompson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Wilkes v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Paulling v. MeadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  5. Camp v. SimonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Costa & Head (Birmingham One), Ltd. v. National Bank of Commerce of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API