Legal Opinion

City of Cottonwood Falls v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1923No. 24,344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Chase, district court; William C. Harris, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Hopkins, J.:

The city of Cottonwood Falls, which is of the third class, sought to compel the county to pay for the paving of a bridge across the Cottonwood river. The bridge lies wholly within the limits of the city. Judgment was for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Prior to 1904 the north limits of the city were formed by the south bank of the river. In that year the limits on the north were extended *165so as to include both banks of the river and ground approximately 200 yards beyond. Sometime in the seventies, Falls township, within which the city is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Eudora v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Board of Commissioners v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. City of Rosedale v. GoldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Jackson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Hoffman v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. TolandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API