Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hillerson v. Bismarck Public Schools

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2013No. 20130101Published

1DissentMaring, Justice

[¶ 26] I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the release of liabili*73ty in this case is ambiguous. However, I am of the opinion that the waiver of liability is void and unenforceable because it violates clear public policy. I would, therefore, reverse and remand this case for trial.

I

[¶ 27] Contracts exonerating parties from liability for their conduct are generally disfavored in the law. Reed v. University of North Dakota, 1999 ND 25, ¶ 22, 589 N.W.2d 880; Kondrad v. Bismarck Park District, 2003 ND 4, ¶ 6, 655 N.W.2d 411. “[Contractual exculpatory clauses are strictly construed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. Sharon v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API