Shettle v. Smith
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
RATLIFF, Judge.
In his Petition for Rehearing Smith contends that our statement of the facts in this case is erroneous. Smith argues that the Board did not deny his request for a continuance and that the Board’s letter of December 10, 1979, did not advise him of the fact that the Board did not agree to continue his appeal from the November 28, 1979, hearing. Because our condensation of the facts appears to be misleading we accept this opportunity to set the record straight. Nevertheless, we affirm our earlier holding in the case and deny Smith’s petition for rehearing.
I…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shettle v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mann v. MannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Shettle v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982