State v. Cardwell
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE BEATTY :
Sarah Cardwell ("Petitioner") appealed her convictions of two counts of unlawful conduct towards a child and two counts of first-degree sexual exploitation of a minor, asserting the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress a video file taken from her laptop computer. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of Petitioner's motion to suppress. State v. Cardwell , 414 S.C. 416, 778 S.E.2d 483 (Ct. App. 2015). We affirm as modified.
I. Factual and Procedural History
Computer technician David Marsh was repairing Petitioner's laptop when Chief Ron…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Shaffer, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. Shaffer, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- State v. Jeremy S. CornishCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
- State v. SpearsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.