Am. Charities for Reasonable Fundraising Regulation, Inc. v. O'Bannon
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge.
*331 This appeal turns on mootness. The issue arose when Utah changed its law governing professional fundraising consultants. Utah officials had interpreted its old law to require the plaintiff, Rainbow Direct Marketing, to register and obtain a permit in the State of Utah. Rainbow viewed these requirements as unconstitutional and unsuccessfully sued in district court. But during the appeal, Utah substantially revised its law, prompting officials to concede that the new restrictions do not apply to Rainbow. This change in the law renders the appeal moot.
I. Applying the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prison Legal News v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Daves v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Daves v. Dallas County TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Scannell Properties 516 v. City of Edwardsville, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026
- Tracy v. SimplifiDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022