Legal Opinion

Magic City Amusement Co. v. Hastings

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 17, 1941No. 29611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This appeal presents alleged error in the trial court’s confirmation of a sheriff’s sale in an action originally instituted December 16, 1931, by Exchange National Company and Exchange Trust Company to recover judgment against Magic City Amusement Company and others in the principal sum of $288,400 upon promissory notes and to foreclose a real estate mortgage covering premises commonly known as “The Coliseum,” in Tulsa, Okla.

The judgment thus sought was entered on April 26, 1932, and thereafter on February 26, 1938, assigned to the parties appearing herein as defendants in error. One of them,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hopkins v. . EnsignNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Turner v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Guaranty Bank of Oklahoma City v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curt Daniels Vs. John Holtz Wsh Properties Llc Navajo Associates, Llc, John Does And Jane Roes 1–5Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. City of Chicago v. Hart Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. People v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API