Legal Opinion

Lexow v. St. Lawrence Marble Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to vacate attachments.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The defendant moves tó vacate the attachments upon the papers on which they were granted. Various objections to the sufficiency of' the affidavits to justify attachments are made, one of which, and the most important, seems well founded.

The plaintiffs, in their affidavits, claim that the defendant, which is a domestic corporation, has disposed of. and removed from the state some of its property with intent to defraud its creditors.

For proof of this conclusion, the affidavits disclose that, in contemplation of insolvency, and being insolvent, the defendant has paid Chicago and New York…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Casola v. . VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lukens Iron & Steel Co. v. PayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. V. G. Pfluke Co. v. PapuliasNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API