Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Jolley Associates

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 15, 2006No. 05-196PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. The Town of Shelburne appeals an Environmental Court ruling on summary judgment that allows Jolley Associates (“Jolley”) to proceed with its application for a proposed gas station and convenience store on Route 7 in Shelburne. The Town argues that the court exceeded its jurisdiction and that further consideration of Jolley’s proposed development should be precluded because its conditional use application was already once denied on the merits. We affirm.

¶ 2. This is the second appeal arising from Jolley’s application for this project. Jolley submitted its conditional use application five…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. In Re Appeals of GarenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. In Re Application of CarrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Jolley AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. A. Johnson Conditional Use PermitVermont Superior Court · 2007
  3. Armour Siding ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2006
  4. Cetrangolo & DeFeliceVermont Superior Court · 2007
  5. Cochran SubdivisionVermont Superior Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API