Legal Opinion

State v. Ramer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 7, 1987No. 4-86-0536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

The issue before us is whether the fruits of a search and seizure should be suppressed because the city police officer who conducted the search was outside his municipal limits when he did so. The trial court granted the motion to suppress. We disagree and reverse.

The city officer, who conducted the search in an unincorporated area of the county, was also a duly sworn and properly appointed special deputy sheriff. Nonetheless, the trial court found he had no authority to act outside of his municipal jurisdiction and was prohibited from so doing under section 30.09(4), Florida…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Caplan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API