Legal Opinion

State v. Hardee

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 14, 1972No. 19516Published

1Concurrence · BusseyBussey, Justice

(concurring in result) :

This appeal presents for decision only a single, narrow question. Appellant’s sole contention is that “under the language” of the Frazier grant her title extends to the usual low water mark of Salt Creek. The majority opinion holds that she has failed to prove her “title to the land to the low water mark on Salt Creek”, which is dispositive of her appeal and to this limited extent I agree with the majority opinion.

There is nothing in the record to show precisely where the lots of the appellant are located with reference to the *544plat attached to and made a part of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Brailsford.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Haesloop v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Cape Romain Land & Imp. Co. v. Ga.-Car. Canning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API