Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Martin. Pulaski superior court. October 5, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtEish, C. J.

1.. In the absence of a request so to do, the failure of the judge in charging the jury to apply a rule of evidence to the testimony of a particular witness is not cause for a new trial. Knight v. State, 114 Ga. 48 (6), (39 S. E. 928). Accordingly, there was no merit in the following assignment of error: “While the judge properly admitted in evidence, the statements of the deceased that she had, a short time before the homicide, seen defendant engaged in adultery with deceased’s husband, these statements being coupled with a threat against defendant, yet the judge nowhere instructed the jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Burge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Queen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Pless v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API