Legal Opinion

Stoes Brothers, Inc. v. Freudenthal

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1969No. 346PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff (appellant) brought this suit in tort against its insurance broker (appellee) ; charging him with negligence in failing to obtain business interruption insurance. Plaintiff claims that it sustained substantial damage through loss of business occasioned by fire damage to its place of business.

This appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action as to the defendant, Max A. Freudenthal. The defendant, L. E. Freudenthal, was dismissed at the close of plaintiff’s case and this dismissal is not an issue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Company v. JollyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Kap-Pel Fabrics, Inc. v. R. B. Jones & Sons, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Williams v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Schustrin v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Brown v. CooleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Insurance Network of Texas v. Kloesel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  2. Martini v. Beaverton Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stock v. ADCO General Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Le Doux ex rel. Gallegos v. PetersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Prophet v. S. H. Kress Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API