In re Samantha B.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The respondent mother (respondent) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights. The respondent claims that the trial court improperly (1) terminated her parental rights on the statutory ground of failure to achieve personal rehabilitation, (2) terminated her parental rights where such termination denied her rights to equal protection of the law guaranteed under the constitution of Connecticut and (3) found clear and convincing evidence that termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of the child. We find no merit to any of these claims and…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Michael R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- In re Karrlo K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In re Tricia A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In Interest of Elsa F., (Jul. 11, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- In re Samantha B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999