Legal Opinion
Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Forty-second Street & Grand Street Ferry Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtSteckler, J.
The action is for an injunction restraining the defendants the city of Hew York, the Department of Docks and the Forty-second St. & Grand St. Ferry E.E. Co. from constructing a bulkhead across the railroad company’s water lots in the Hudson river from the southerly side of West Forty-third street to the southerly side of West Forty-second street.
In July, 1850, the city conveyed to Caleb F. Iindsley in fee by two conveyances certain water lots, or grounds under water, bounded on the north by the centre line of Forty-third street, on the south by the centre line of Forty-second street, on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Langdon v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- The People v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Kane v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- St. Vincent Female Orphan Asylum v. City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ludwin v. SianoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
- Ludwin v. SianoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901