Legal Opinion

Spieker v. Skelly Oil Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1954No. 5786PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Justice.

Appellee Spieker, on April 15, 1953, filed ■his claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act against appellant, Skelly Oil Company, seeking compensation for injuries sustained by appellee January 13, 1953 while employed by the company as a roustabout in the oil fields. Claim was for total and permanent disability, attorney’s fee, medical expenses and hospitalization. Appellant’s answer admitted the accident, denied the disability and, by way of affirmative defense, alleged that appellee’s action was prematurely filed for the reason that, at the time appellee instituted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George v. Miller & Smith, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hathaway v. New Mexico State PoliceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Anderson v. Contract Trucking Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Mountain States Mut. Cas. Co. v. SwopeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kermac Nuclear Fuels Corp. v. LarrazoloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Baca v. Swift & CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Swallows v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Collins v. Big Four Paving, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API