Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Welch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1961Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

*318Alexander G-. Brown, City Attorney, and Richard A. Braman and Delbert A. Weaver, Deputy City Attorneys, Portland, for the petition. GOODWIN, J.

Courts traditionally seek to interpret legislation, if possible, to avoid rendering it invalid. In our previous opinion, handed down September 20, 1961, we followed this doctrine. We rested our decision on the fatal defect in the complaint so we would not have to reach the virtually obvious unconstitutionality of the ordinance if it granted plenary powers of censorship to a police officer. The complaint did not describe an offense.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Times Film Corp. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Gelling v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API