Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Mueller v. Missouri Division of Family Services

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1997No. 96-1409EMPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petitioner, Keith Mueller, alleges that his two sons, Matthew A. Mueller and Scott D. Mueller, are in the custody of an agency of the State of Missouri, the Missouri Division of Family Services (DFS), and that their custody is contrary to the Constitution of the United States. The District Court 1 dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction. The appellee, an agency of the State of Missouri, has made no submission in this Court. We affirm.

I

This case comes to us with a complicated procedural…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lehman Ex Rel. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. C.M. v. K.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Mary Amerson, as Next Friend of M.H. v. State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Human Services by Charles Palmer, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Missouri Division of Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Antar v. LodiceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  3. Sai Malena Jimenez-Fogarty v. Thomas FogartyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
  4. Thomas Richard Ollestad v. Brian Smith and Lucas AtheyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
  5. Vann-El v. United States District Court for the District of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API