Legal Opinion

Eyanson v. Waidlich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1910No. 8252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered April 20, 1909, in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This action was begun by Thomas E. Eyanson, who thereafter died, and is now prosecuted by plaintiffs, who are his heirs and legal representatives. In the year 1892, Thomas E. Eyanson, Dr. A. P. Mitten, and C. D. Waidlich, the ancestor of defendants, purchased a tract of land in King county, Washington. At the time, Eyanson and Mitten were residents of Seattle, and Waidlich was then, and up to the time of his death in 1902, a resident of the state of Indiana. The purchase price of the tract was $30,000. Eyanson and Mitten each paid $5,000, Waidlich paid $10,000, being his share in full, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDougall v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Golden v. Pilchuck Tribe No. 42, Improved Order of Red MenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hodge v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API