Legal Opinion

Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wall

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 1, 1997No. 960362-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge:

Bear River Mutual Insurance Company (Bear River) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of John and Nancy Wall. The district court ordered Bear River to continue to pay personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to its no-fault insureds, the Walls, despite the insureds’ settlement with and release of the third-party tortfeasor and the tortfeasor’s insurer. We affirm.

FACTS

The material facts in this ease are undisputed. In August 1992, Nancy Wall was in an automobile accident in Colorado. Pursuant to its insurance policy with the Walls, Bear River…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Osuala v. Aetna Life & CasualtyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Laub v. SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TELEPHONE ASS'NUtah Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. v. WallUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bello v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API