Legal Opinion

(PC) Polk v. Lattimore

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 4, 2020No. 1:12-cv-01156Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUSAN MAE POLK, No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MARY LATTIMORE, et al., (Doc. No. 120) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 BACKGROUND 21 This case has had a lengthy history since its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API