Legal Opinion

Brooke v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1965No. 3590 and 3591PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

These appeals are from convictions of possession of narcotics, 1 and narcotic vagrancy. 2 No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the convictions, but it is contended that a motion to suppress evidence seized at the time of arrest should have been granted. The arrests and seizures occurred under the following circumstances. On October 23,1963, detective Paul of the Narcotic Squad obtained a warrant for the arrest of one Scott. Between October 1963 and February 1964, he made three visits to a house where Scott was supposed to be living but was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Percy E. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  3. Palmer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hattie Mae Ricks and Joseph N. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Hughes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lloyd A. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Lloyd A. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API