Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Young

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1897No. 7401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from the district court of Kimball county. Tried below before Neville, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

Action by Anna Young against the Union Pacific Railway Company to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s mule, alleged to have been killed by one of defendant’s engines at a place on its road where it ought to have been, but was not, fenced. Forty-one errors are assigned, but none of them can be considered, for the reason we have no jurisdiction of the cause, as we will now show. Attached to the transcript is the following certificate of the clerk of the trial court:

“State of Nebraska, 1 Kimball County, j ‘
“I, S. Wooldridge, clerk of the district court of Kimball county, do hereby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hoagland v. Van EttenNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Delaney v. ErricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  4. McDonald v. GrabowNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hollingsworth v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Melcher v. HaleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API