Legal Opinion

Jorkiewicz v. American Brake Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge. (1) Defendant’s instruction of nonsuit should have been given, because (a) The evidence established, without conflict, Cripps and plaintiff were fellow-servants. (b) The dual capacity doctrine is established in Missouri. Garland v. Railroad, 85 Mo. App. 579; Robinson v. Railroad, 133 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge. (1) Defendant’s instruction of nonsuit should have been given, because (a) The evidence established, without conflict, Cripps and plaintiff were fellow-servants. (b) The dual capacity doctrine is established in Missouri. Garland v. Railroad, 85 Mo. App. 579; Robinson v. Railroad, 133 Mo. App. 101; Moore v. Railroad, 85 Mo. 588; Card v. Eddy, 129 Mo. 510; Hawk v. Lumber Co., 166 Mo. 121; Relyea v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 86; Livengood v. Lead '& Zinc Co., 179 Mo. 229; Thompson on Negligence, p. 952; Weekes v. Scharer, 11 Fed.…

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

— This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the erUploy of the defendant corporation as its servant. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

Plaintiff, at the time of his injury, was working as a member of a crew of five men, known as the “hammer crew,” in defendant’s factory. He was assisting in the making of crank-shafts, which was done by placing a heated billet of metal in a die and causing it to be struck a number of blows by a steam hammer, and was injured by a piece of such heated metal, which was sheared off…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Schroeder v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Miller v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Burkard v. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Bane v. IrwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Duvall v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API