Legal Opinion

McGee v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1928No. 8 Div. 673PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

[1] This court does not favor reversals of the judgments of the»nisi prius courts on technical rulings which work no, injury to the appellants.- However, orderly procedure and regulated methods, in the indictment, trial, and conviction or acquittal of those charged with crime, must-be preserved —otherwise, we would drift into chaos, thence on into- anarchy.

In this case the appellant was regularly charged by indictment only with the offense of having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, or malted liquors, etc., contrary to law,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Stephens v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Aris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Whitson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API