Commonwealth v. Hutchinson
Recorder of Philadelphia
December, 1842. The arguments of the counsel in the case were concluded.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Recorder:
It may be said that the expression at length, and in writing, of an opinion of the magistrate before whom a primary hearing, exparte, is had, on holding the party charged to answer before the proper tribunal, is calculated to prejudice his rights and interests on the trial by a jury. Reflection will convince all, that no injury can follow such a course, but on the contrary, much good will result to the community at large, and to the individual who may be the immediate object of its operation.
If the magistrate forms any opinion, it must be expressed, either by the binding over…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ShallCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York · 1829
- Commonwealth v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810
- People v. FitchNew York Supreme Court · 1828